statistically significant classification

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "statistically significant classification" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to data analysis, research, or statistics, particularly when discussing the reliability of a classification method or result. Example: "The study revealed a statistically significant classification of the data, indicating that the model performed better than random chance."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

This did not give statistically significant classification.

Plosone

Of the six EGFR-related parameters examined, only CEN7/cell, cutoff=4.0, provided statistically significant classification with respect to OS (P=0.02).

British Journal of Cancer

The pan-cancer panel of 89 selected loci achieved a classification accuracy of 97.57%, averaged over the 12 cancer types with statistically significant classification rates (Additional file 5: Table S2).

Epigenetics and Chromatin

Epidermal growth factor receptor/CEN7 gain, cutoff=34% (P=0.02), and EGFR/CEN7, cutoff >1.0 (P=0.04), were the only EGFR-related parameters to provide statistically significant classification with respect to PFS.

British Journal of Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

As shown in Table 1, three feature types: word location, neighboring words and word, gave (statistically significant) better classification results than the TF IDF baseline.

Bioinformatics

When testing the technique in a three-class classification problem of voice data, a statistically significant improvement in classification accuracy was obtained if compared to parallel committees.

Expert Systems with Applications

This allows us to conduct tests for statistically significant differences in classification performance between the different character embedding methods.

Journal of Big Data

Using object-based image analysis, there was a statistically significant difference in classification accuracy between maps produced using the DT algorithm compared to maps produced using either RF (p = 0.0116) or SVM algorithms (p = 0.0067).

Remote Sensing of Environment

Moreover, the number of males is significantly larger than the number of females which makes it easier to get statistically significant results in classification experiments for the male subjects.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

There was no statistically significant difference in classification accuracy of MI of different limbs.

Clinical Neurophysiology

Of interest is the observation that there was no statistically significant difference in classification accuracy between different limbs.

Clinical Neurophysiology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "statistically significant classification", ensure you specify the statistical test used and the associated p-value to provide context for the significance.

Common error

Avoid assuming that a "statistically significant classification" automatically implies high practical or clinical value. Statistical significance does not always equate to real-world importance.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "statistically significant classification" functions as a descriptor, typically used to qualify a classification process or its result. It indicates that the classification is reliable and not due to random chance. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "statistically significant classification" is a phrase primarily used in scientific contexts to describe a classification that is supported by statistical evidence and unlikely to have occurred by chance. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable. While it is not a very common phrase, its usage is consistent within scientific literature. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to specify the statistical test and p-value to ensure clarity and avoid overstating the practical importance of the classification.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant statistical categorization

Reorders the terms and replaces 'classification' with 'categorization' to alter the emphasis.

statistically validated classification

Replaces 'significant' with 'validated', focusing on the validation aspect of the classification.

classification with statistical significance

Rearranges the phrase to emphasize the presence of statistical significance in the classification.

significant data segregation

Substitutes 'classification' with 'data segregation', highlighting the act of separating data into meaningful groups.

statistically robust categorization

Uses 'robust' instead of 'significant', stressing the reliability of the categorization.

noteworthy statistical classification

Replaces 'significant' with 'noteworthy', suggesting that the classification is remarkable or important.

classification showing statistical relevance

Replaces 'significance' with 'relevance', focusing on the practical importance of the classification.

classification yielding statistically meaningful results

Expands the phrase to describe the outcome of the classification process, emphasizing the results.

statistical distinction in classification

Focuses on the 'distinction' implied by a statistically significant finding.

classification supported by statistical evidence

Emphasizes that the classification is backed by statistical proof.

FAQs

How can I use "statistically significant classification" in a sentence?

You might say, "The study demonstrated a "statistically significant classification" of patients based on their genetic markers, which could improve treatment strategies."

What does "statistically significant classification" mean?

It means that the classification achieved is unlikely to have occurred by random chance and is supported by statistical evidence.

Is there a difference between "statistically significant classification" and "statistically significant difference"?

Yes, "statistically significant classification" refers to the outcome of a classification process, while "statistically significant difference" refers to a difference observed between groups or variables.

What are some alternatives to "statistically significant classification"?

Alternatives include "significant statistical categorization" or "statistically validated classification", depending on the desired nuance.