Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
There were no statistically significance differences between the different occupational groups' ability to characterise basic cough quality (wheeze p = 0.54 and mucus p = 0.38) or to assign a diagnosis (p = 0.36).
Categorical data from these studies have been summarised, alongside findings from the current study, in Table 4. Chi square statistical tests (Fishers exact), have been used to test for statistically significance differences.
We did not find statistically significance differences when we compared de dose administrated (p = 0.25).
Ammonia levels ranged from approximately 0.9 to 2.4 mg per gram of cigarette filler between brands and statistically significance differences were observed between brands and manufacturers.
When a 5 μg mL−1 solution of these compounds were analyzed with both methods we do not observed any statistically significance differences.
No other statistically significance differences were observed.
Similar(45)
Comparison of the OLS model (Model 1) and the LMM (Model 2) using likelihood ratio test suggested a statistically significance difference (p < 0.001) between the two models.
There was a statistically significance difference (P<0.004).
*Bolded text indicates a statistically significance difference suggested by a p-value of less than.05.
There was no statistically significance difference in height, weight and body-mass index.
There was no statistically significance difference between the two groups (p = 0.357) (Table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com