Overall, results of the statistical data analyses showed that there is no statistically significant difference between the means of the normalized shear capacity of the SCC and CC beams.
Statistical data analyses were performed using non-parametrical Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney statistics.
Statistical data analyses (parametric and non-parametric) showed that there is no statistically significant difference in the normalized shear strength of the SCC and CC beams tested in this study.
JMP Pro software (ver. 11.2.0, SAS, Cary, NC, USA) was used for the statistical data analyses.
Acquisition of data, statistical data analyses, and data interpretations were led by JAT, CDW, and PMB.
For better tracking statistical data analyses we labeled also degrees of freedom (df) within the text.
Statistical data analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Statistical data analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.1 (SAS, Cary, NC and SPSSS version 12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
Statistical data analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 20.0.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), adopting a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
The model outcomes are then compared with the collected plant data and a sequence of statistical data analyses selects the most suitable model among them.
Furthermore, statistical data analyses (both parametric and non-parametric) were performed to evaluate whether or not there was any statistically significant difference between the shear strength of the recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) and CC beams.
