Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Statistical analysis (means, medians, range, standard deviations), significance of group differences and linear regression were evaluated using SPSS software (release 16.0, SPSS Inc., USA) or GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad, San Diego, USA).
For statistical analysis, means and standard deviations were calculated.
Statistical analysis: means, standard deviations and percentages were used to describe the data.
Similar(57)
For the statistical analysis, mean data from the years 2001 09 of the MODIS LST JanTmean and AnnTmean maps were extracted from the reconstructed database for each trap.
For statistical analysis, mean ERP amplitude values were calculated for two regions of interest (ROIs) over the midline of the scalp: one anterior with electrodes AFZ, FZ, FCZ, and CZ, and one posterior with electrodes CPZ, PZ, POZ, and OZ.
For statistical analysis, mean amplitude values were computed for four regions of interest (ROIs): left anterior (F7, F3, FT7, FC3), right anterior (F8, F4, FT8, FC4), left posterior (C3, CP5, P7, P3) and right posterior (C4, CP6, P4, P8).
For statistical analysis, mean values of VGAT and VGLUT2 terminals were obtained for each animal and analyzed by either two-way ANOVA or one-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism (version 5.03).
For statistical analysis, mean amplitude values within a time window from 160 to 200 ms (centred around the ERAN peak) were calculated for 4 Regions of Interest (ROIs; see also inset of Figure 3B): left anterior (AF3, F7, F3, FT7, FC3), right anterior (AF4, F8, F4, FT8, FC4), left posterior (T7, C3, CP5, P7, P3), and right posterior (T8, C4, CP6, P8, P4).
Statistical Analysis: Mean and standard deviation values were calculated and graphs prepared by Microsoft Excel.
Thus 304 valid questionnaires were available for statistical analysis (mean age, 26.8 ± 9.0 years; range, 18 67).
For all statistical analysis, mean values per patient for each lesion type and normal-appearing white matter were used.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com