Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
The boxplot in figure 1 shows station score variation by HP group.
Five students (28%) received a station score of 3 or higher on two stations, and four students (22%) received a station score of 3 or higher on three or four stations.
Table 2 shows inter-rater reliability (weighted κ) and station score reliability given two assessors (average measures ICC).
Given that there was strong assessor agreement, the mean of the two assessors' scores became the station score for each candidate.
Figure 1 shows that the proportion of learners who achieved a station score above borderline satisfactory (rating=2) varied across stations and by HP learner group.
One student (6%) did not achieve a station score of 3 or higher on any of the stations (a score of 3=COMPETENCE DEMONSTRATED for a learner at this level Skills: Good) and eight students (44%) received a station score of 3 or higher on only one station.
Similar(52)
But the commercial sports station scored a potentially significant victory after the trust ruled that the way the station measures its news output may not be rigorous enough.
The station scores were highly reliable.
The distribution of station scores was tested for normality.
The session was held once the station scores were available from the performance examination center for the resident to review.
When calculated on the station scores (the mean of the competency area ratings within a station), assessor agreement was excellent for all four stations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com