Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
The 10-node static plan is the only static plan that meets the QoS target all the time, but it costs 36.67% more total resources than the dynamic plan.
The static plan achieves an average response time of 0.897 seconds, while the dynamic plan shows slightly better 0.873 seconds.
The 9-node static plan meets the QoS target all the time except the 19th hour, and it costs 29.63% more total resources than the dynamic plan.
Compared to the 8-node static plan, the dynamic plan saves as much as 20.83% of total resources, i.e., 40 node-hour.
Figures 12 and 13 compare the performance of the proposed dynamic plan to the traditional static plan in both response time of the Reader Tier and throughput of the Loader Tier.
There are 13 data points where its response time exceeds 0.7 second in the 6-node static plan, which causes as much as 54.17% QoS violation; in contrast, no QoS violation occurs in the dynamic plan.
Similar(51)
However, because ARA* is an anytime algorithm, it is only applicable in static planning domains.
This unpredictability in load is due to accommodating requests coming from a group of users, without being constrained into a static planning of the infrastructural capacity.
Additionally, due to the predictable system load, the frequency assignment was often based on static planning, which could be done easily offline.
The system is composed of modeling module, data interface module, data analysis module, static planning module, re-planning module, plan evaluation module, plan simulation module and human-computer interaction module.
Systematic conservation planning has become an important tool for increasing the efficiency of conservation decisions, but many planning efforts result in static plans that may lose relevance over time.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com