Abelard calls statements propositions (propositio) and what is asserted by a statement its dictum.
But taking ontological commitment to be not just be analyzed in terms of an entailment relation to "claims" (or "statements" or "propositions"), in addition to disagreeing with common usage, fails to solve the problem of ontological neutrality; for claims, statements, propositions, and the like are no less controversial entities than kinds.
We observe that the same reasoning which proves that theorem can be applied to prove the more general statement Proposition 4.4.
So Schwarzenegger convened a meeting of his financial advisory committee, the Economic Recovery Council, led by Buffett and George Shultz; and at a press conference, with a chastened Buffett at his side, he declared that if Buffett issued any more statements about Proposition 13 he would make him do five hundred sit-ups.
Proposition 10 can be proved in a way analogous to the proof of Proposition 3. The statement of Proposition 10 remains true if we replace (27) with mu_{t,t+1}(m,V =phi_{t}(m+V_{t}),quad minbar{L}^{0}_{t+1}, Vinmathbb{V}^{p}.
Statements or propositions are logically related in the sense of reasonableness if the truth or falsity of one requires truth or falsity in the other.
But then Brooks's attack on paraphrase is itself paraphrased: "Brooks emphasizes that it is not the purpose of a poem to produce a statement, a proposition, a didactic lesson or message".
Tim Paulson, executive director of the San Francisco Labor Council, who helped negotiate the agreement, said in a statement that Proposition F would "repel progress" and called the new housing agreement "the best deal for working families, for the Bayview community and for the city of San Francisco".
Is the supervaluationist characterizing vague statements as propositions?
Assume that any empirical statement, or proposition, can be expressed in a single language.
