Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(2)
We gathered a few representative statements in Tables 1, 2 and 3.
For all statements in Tables 7 and 8, participants were asked to rate how much they agree with each statement from 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree.
Similar(58)
Numbers of quotes coded under each of the themes and corresponding percentages are presented in relation to all coded statements in Table 2.
For statements in Table 9, they were asked how much they might feel each emotion from 1 = Never to 5 = All of the time.
As is the case with norms for any instructional situation, the statements in Table 1 represent our hypotheses of shared expectations of the teacher and students regarding students' mathematical work and the exchange value of that work; they do not represent standards for correctness or desirability we espouse.
For a closer analysis of attitudes towards EBM the 10 statements in Table 3 plus the statement "Cochrane reviews are the most reliable" were entered into a principal component analysis yielding three components with eigenvalue over 1, as shown in Table 2.
Nevertheless, this small subset of studies was still included alongside the statements in Table 3 for completeness.
Researchers were asked to rate their agreement (strongly agree to strongly disagree) with the statements in table 3.
*Minimum, most likely and maximum values defined based of the comparison of the importance of the first criterion in relation to the second for the objective under consideration using the preference statements in Table 1.
We examined the associations between the general attitudes (see statements in Table 3) and the time that the physician had been using his current ePrescription system (two groups), using Mann-Whitney U-test.
There is statistically significant evidence of an association between setting and the propensity to agree with the first and second statements in Table 5 (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com