Sentence examples for statements in clusters from inspiring English sources

Statements in Clusters 2, 3, 7, and 8 tended to refer to actual health conditions, health care and, in particular, decisions about using CAM for medical conditions.

Statements in Clusters 4 and 5 had high bridging values (.60 and.54 respectively), suggesting less agreement in terms of the way statements were sorted.

Statement 35 was about the SAVAHCS, and was positioned near other SAVAHCS-related statements in Clusters 4, 6 and 7. Statements 25 and 98 addressed massage therapy, which could be interpreted as similar to CAM statements in adjacent Clusters 6 8.

Statements about access to CAM (e.g., how much was paid out of pocket, and whether CAM should be available through the SAVAHCS) were deemed to be distinct from CAM statements in Clusters 6 8, which focused on CAM modalities, CAM provider issues, and interaction between CAM and conventional care.

Several statements in Cluster 4 addressed satisfaction with SAVAHCS care.

Interestingly, some statements in Cluster 4 made direct reference to CAM.

Similar to Cluster 1, the statements in Cluster 2 asked for information that patients could assess about themselves (Table 2).

Cluster 3 statements related to care for health conditions whereas behavior-related statements in Cluster 2 centered on risk and risk-diminishment.

The importance ratings averaged across statements in Cluster 1 suggested that panel members rated this cluster as more important than some other clusters.

The presence of non-contiguous, CAM-related statements in Cluster 4 suggests that panel members considered CAM access to be distinct from other CAM issues.

Since there were both pro-CAM and anti-CAM panel members (and since panelists were the originators of most of the statements), there were statements in Cluster 7 with different "spins" regarding CAM.