Sentence examples for statement version from inspiring English sources

One version had the completion tick-box at the start of the item statement (version 1).

The other version had the completion tick-box at the end of the item statement (version 2).

Children in this study reported that they preferred the tick-box to be at the end of the item statement (Version 2).

This is not to say that there are not ontologies which would provide a framework in which the reason-statement version of the distinction could be useful.

Someone who holds that reasons are true propositions or states of affairs and who also holds that there are no irreducibly indexical propositions or states of affairs (only indexical 'modes of presentation' of such propositions or states of affairs) will have trouble making use of the reason-statement version of the distinction for just this reason.

Finally, and surprisingly, students who were asked to define common ancestor before responding to the statements (version C) were less likely to agree that pairs of organisms had a common ancestor than those not asked to define common ancestry before responding (version D).

(It is in the recommended syllabus statement a version of: Don't ask; don't tell). .

So far, it looks like we have a kind of dominance argument for the reason-statement-based version of the distinction.

On the reason-statement-based version of the distinction, the reason is agent-relative only if a full statement of the reason must involve pronominal reference to the agent for whom it is a reason.

Given this package of ontological views, the reason-statement-based version of the distinction looks unhelpful.

However, the reason-statement-based version of the distinction has problems of its own.