Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
This is suggested both by the expression "wrong if" and by Kant's explicit statement: "this principle is, furthermore, only negative, i.e., it only serves for the recognition of what is not just to others".[4] Such a reading entails a difference with the categorical imperative insofar as the latter is a necessary and sufficient condition for permissibility.
Similar(58)
One clear statement of this principle is provided by Moses Mendelssohn in his Philosophische Schriften.
At the Edinburgh summit at the end of 1992, certain clear statements were made about this principle in response to Denmark's rejection of the Maastricht Treaty, but they were unfortunately not taken up by the European Parliament, nor have they been included in the Irish draft.
According to this principle, every mathematical statement is either true or false; no other possibility is allowed.
This pithy statement of principle was adopted time and again for good reason: improvements in performance and fuel economy follow from reductions in vehicle weight.
This principle embodied within this statement has guided positional cloning for a long time.
This statement is in principle subject to experimental testing, provided that we define the biological meaning of the threshold.
This statement is in principle separate and independent from the scaling law itself since it counts the SUM of the rates of domain additions and deletions and not the DIFFERENCE between them.
This is a larger statement of principle than it might seem.
This was, however, a statement of principle rather than fact; without British cooperation it remained a dead letter.
While this is a correct statement in principle, whether one can measure all the components experimentally depends upon many practical factors.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com