Sentence examples for statement science from inspiring English sources

In a 28 May statement, Science Editor-in-Chief Marcia McNutt said the journal was retracting the paper, at Green's request, because LaCour had made false statements about his funding sources and incentive methods and could not produce the raw data that would allow others to reproduce the results.

A journal spokesperson last week released the following statement: "Science has received the committee report and is now following up with a few additional questions, including some to the other institutions involved and [we] hope to have a published statement and decision as soon as possible".

In a press statement, Science Inc. chief executive officer Michael Jones said "We're blown away by the continued impact Pray.com has had on its members and are excited to see how the platform will scale to inspire more people to connect with their faith leaders, unite and heal through prayer and give back to their communities".

For example, following the workshops we would expect less agreement with the statement "Science classes are different from courses in other subjects in that students must learn the content before they can think about it analytically".

At T0, over 50% of students disagreed with the statement "Science is always about being sure of the answer".

In order to illustrate its character, I'll present here four entries from the glossary: rhetorical statement, natural science (or physics), divine science (or metaphysics), and mathematics.

While the event was taking place, MacFarlane made a statement mocking science advocates as "precious petals" for their objection to the lack of a dedicated minister for science in government.

However, I disagree with his statement that "science demands heroic minds, but not heroic morals".

In the autumn statement, the science budget was spared from the biggest cuts and the chancellor added £600m for investment in research facilities.

Finally, here's what the prestigious American Association for the Advancement of Science, said in a 2012 statement: The science is quite clear: crop improvement by the modern molecular techniques of biotechnology is safe.

Fortunately, against the brief statement from science's grandees we can place much more considered analyses from the likes of social scientist Brigitte Nerlich, statistician David Spiegelhalter, and seismologist Austin Elliot (the latter's analysis is particularly good).