Suggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The single statement revision in round three was a grammatical change to enhance clarity.
The authors probably mean to make the following statement (revision in bold italics ): "The largest pool of reviewed and automatically annotated proteins is provided by the UniProt Consortium.
Similar(57)
Each statement a revision of the last, except when they were duplicates.
Controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement and revision may be necessary as new data appear.
Although an effort is under way to revise the prior version of the guide, contrary to the editorial's statements, the revision will not provide "agents significant new powers".
Further controlled clinical studies may be needed to clarify aspects of these statements, and revision may be necessary as new data appear.
They quickly realized their stance could potentially compromise academic freedom and withdrew the statement to revise (a year later, it is still under revision).
Mr. Calatrava issued a statement saying the revision was "just the latest example of many changes we have recommended" to save time and money "while preserving the integrity of the original design".
We have qualified the statement in the revision.
Author response : We softened this statement in the revision.
I have corrected this statement in the revision.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com