Sentence examples for statement in table from inspiring English sources

Additionally, correlations between preparedness and self-efficacy are stronger when the self-efficacy statement refers to preparedness for natural hazards in general (first statement in Table 4) rather than response and recovery activities for lahars specifically.

The latter predicts instead that if the male is double-infected, only a double-infected female can successfully mate with it (statement D' in Table 1).

The counter-factual approach to causality (last statement in Table 1), although of questionable empirical content, has great heuristic strengths.

By contrast, respondents in the Netherlands study were much more likely than those in the England study to indicate that they took into account the possibility that some treatment or relief would be provided (there is statistically significant evidence of an association between setting and the propensity to agree with the sixth statement in Table  5; p < 0.01).

Numbers of quotes coded under each of the themes and corresponding percentages are presented in relation to all coded statements in Table 2.

For statements in Table 9, they were asked how much they might feel each emotion from 1 = Never to 5 = All of the time.

As is the case with norms for any instructional situation, the statements in Table 1 represent our hypotheses of shared expectations of the teacher and students regarding students' mathematical work and the exchange value of that work; they do not represent standards for correctness or desirability we espouse.

For a closer analysis of attitudes towards EBM the 10 statements in Table 3 plus the statement "Cochrane reviews are the most reliable" were entered into a principal component analysis yielding three components with eigenvalue over 1, as shown in Table 2.

Nevertheless, this small subset of studies was still included alongside the statements in Table  3 for completeness.

Researchers were asked to rate their agreement (strongly agree to strongly disagree) with the statements in table 3.

*Minimum, most likely and maximum values defined based of the comparison of the importance of the first criterion in relation to the second for the objective under consideration using the preference statements in Table  1.