Sentence examples for statement and p from inspiring English sources

Significant relationships were confirmed between study groups and SDS-15 difference (p = 0.05) in the first regression, and study group and patient verbal report measures in the second regressions (p = 0.0005 for percent of problematic SxQOL issues reported using any coached statement, and p = 0.01 for the report index).

where Ω s and Ω p are the same as described in Section "Problem statement", and N p denotes the number of active ports on the switch.

Poisons Centres will be confronted with a new hazard classification according to the CLP Regulation, introducing new health hazard classes and categories, with associated new hazard pictograms, signal words, Hazard(H -statements and Precautionary(P)-statements as H -statementsicandon elements.

Table  3 shows that respondents who reported no education were more likely than those who reported any education to agree with these two statements (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002, respectively).

Age was associated with better ranking of "help patient decide" and "make sure patient understand" statements (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), which were ranked 1 3 by only 46%and42%2% of respondents from the current practice perspective (median ranking score 4 [2,6], p < 0.001 vs. norm perspective for both).

In forward linear regression analysis only the baseline daily urine UA level contributed to verbal fluency (p = 0.01), picture completion (p = 0.001), block design (p = 0.006), vigilance (p = 0.006), subtraction (p = 0.01) and statement verification (p = 0.04) tasks.

Let p, q ∈ M be the vector space of all real-valued polynomials over R. We obtain an orthogonality statement between p and q with respect to the Euclidean scalar product ( p, q ) : = ∫ − ∞ ∞ p ( t ) q ( t ) e − t 2 d t, (7).

end{aligned} (3.5)This transformation behavior, in turn, follows directly from the expression for the semigroup multiplication rule transferred to the upper half space (zeta ^+_{,s}); we record this expression in the following statement and refer to [11], p.

The probability of the police observing a rubbing activity and writing this into a statement (states (P = p) and (P = bar{p})) is higher if at both times the suspect rubbed his face than if he only did this at one point (e.g. an increase by 0.05), and less likely if the suspect was scratching the wall both times (e.g. a decrease by 0.05).

However, Chisholm argued, for any material object statement P and for any sensory conditional (S & A) → (h E, there will be some other material object statement M about the circumstances of perception that is consistent with P, such that P and M can both be true while (S & A) → (h E is false.

As preliminary analysis confirmed a significant main effect of recognition statement type (p < 0.001) and a significant 3-way interaction between recognition statement type, recognition statement valence and training group (p < 0.001), we conducted separate 2 × 2 × 2 ANOVAs for target and foil ratings.