Suggestions(5)
Exact(34)
Reports on the study of a low-fat diet on breast cancer would have more appropriately stated that the study was flawed in implementation since participants were unable to maintain a low-fat diet.
The letter stated that the study did have an effect on which infants died and which developed blindness, and that those risks were not properly communicated to the parents, depriving them of information needed to decide whether to participate.
The committee report stated that the study's findings were not proof of a causal relationship between higher executive pay and a possibly conflicted consultant.
The abstract stated that the study included 3 RCTs and 11 case series.
Three trials which explicitly stated that the study and outcome assessment were unblinded were rated at high risk of bias.
Correction, 31 May: The original version of this article stated that the study donors died at the Karolinska Institute, and it attributed this statement to Jeffrey Macklis.
Similar(26)
The authors state that: "The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of our institutions … and informed written consent was obtained from the patient".
The authors stated that the studies were partly financed by the telecom industry.
The sponsor stated that the studies using NMES and IPC devices were included "as evidence on the association between increased blood flow and a reduction in DVT".
Pace has been internationally condemned, with 42 scientists signing an open letter earlier this year to the editor of The Lancet, stating that the study was "fraught with indefensible methodological problems".
A standardized letter was sent to these patients, which obtained written informed consent and included instructions stating that the study was interested in comorbidities of epilepsy.
More suggestions(15)
stated that the student
stated that the trial
established that the study
stated that the university
stipulated that the study
indicates that the study
emphasized that the study
indicate that the study
demonstrated that the study
indicated that the study
statement that the study
stated that the trials
indicating that the study
asserts that the study
stated that the students
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com