Slightly tongue in cheek, one can group together under this heading approaches as diverse as Everett interpretations (see the entries on Everett's relative-state interpretation and on the many-worlds interpretation), modal interpretations and the Copenhagen interpretation.
Examples of fairy tales in quantum theory are hidden variables and, perhaps surprising for some readers, also the single-particle-state interpretation (in contrast to the ensemble interpretation fostered by Ludwig).
The former sits well with Everett's (1957) original notion of relative state, and with the relational interpretation of Everett preferred by Saunders (e.g. 1993) and, it would seem, Zurek (1998) (see the entry on Everett's relative-state interpretation).
Some of the main workers in the field such as Zeh (2000) and (perhaps) Zurek (1998) suggest that decoherence is most naturally understood in terms of Everett-like interpretations (see below Section 3.3, and the entries on Everett's relative-state interpretation and on the many-worlds interpretation).
In the reported gesture to mental state interpretation data, in [14] two assumptions are made; first, the authors assume that gestures are conditionally independent given the states, and secondly, the states are independent of each other (co-existence of states is not reported in this data).
In support of this discrete-state interpretation, Clark (2012) wrote, regarding the relative judgment strategy, that "…it assumes an all or nothing theory of memory, in which the witness makes a recognition decision based on a true memory, or he or she simply guesses…" (p. 281).
We deem the two constitutional violations described above to be patent and obvious on the face of the statute and impossible for any state interpretation to cure.
Number of distinguishable states interpretation.
This needs to be revised throughout the paper, Title, Abstract, main text etc. Number of distinguishable states interpretation.
Generically speaking, cell culture modelling techniques are classified based upon whether a dynamic or a pseudo-steady-state interpretation of cellular metabolism is used [ 2, 4, 11, 12].
Furthermore, based on the previous comments, we have also made the following changes to the manuscript: A) We no longer use the "number of distinguishable states" interpretation and we have removed all instances of "binary", "ternary", etc.
