Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
I can't get away from the feeling that the MO are putting great store in starting the model run at a certain point in the ENSO cycle.
The model did so well, they write, that, after starting the model in 2010 and running it into the future, "we confidently predict a stable AMOC at least until the end of 2014".
20 21 Starting the model in 1922, we simulated 7000 women for each single year birth cohort, resulting in a population size of 245 000 women.
Starting the model with the Markov approach with the second year the only difference between both model arms arises from the different distribution of patients in the different Markov states after the first year.
Similar(56)
When we started, the model didn't really work at all.
We start the model with a few pages of random words.
The patient started the model with a first depressive event (i.e. no prior depressive events).
Moreover, if we start the model with individuals that already differ in boldness, the behavioral dynamics produced remained the same.
"We start the models from the middle of the 1800s," says Dixon, "and let them run through the present".
Given a variety of starting conditions, the model quickly moves towards a steady-state solution.
Beginners would start with the model on the top floor.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com