Sentence examples for standing doctrine from inspiring English sources

The requirement that a plaintiff shows that the plaintiff has suffered an "injury in fact," is a key element in standing doctrine.

Ben Connable of the Marines wrote that the Human Terrain System approach is a quick-fix policy that "is inconsistent with standing doctrine and ignores recent improvements in military cultural capabilities".

Finding standing as to the tailoring rule could have broader consequences for standing doctrine, and it does not appear that the Supreme Court wishes to open that particular can of worms in this case.

For many years, liberals who have tried to bring federal cases to challenge government actions — in areas from the environment to welfare rights — have been thwarted by conservatives wielding the standing doctrine as a way to throw these cases out of court.

If our standing doctrine recognized this as a distinction with a dispositive effect, the injury claimed would not qualify: the Court is certainly right in concluding that appellees sue not in personal capacities, but as holders of seats in the Congress.

This Note explores the confines of the standing doctrine and Article III judicial power as exercised in patent cases, particularly in appeals at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Federal Circuitit"), an Article III appellate tribunal, that originate from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB"), an Article I administrative tribunal.

Ever since, the Obama DOJ has invoked secrecy and standing doctrines to prevent any courts from ruling on whether the warrantless eavesdropping powers granted by the 2008 law violate the Constitution.

"Typically, the public-interest advocates, usually on the liberal side of the spectrum, favor very loose standing doctrines, and people who want to protect government from scrutiny, who tend to be on the conservative side, want to require more and more specific standing requirements".

Although both political question and standing doctrines remain tools in the Court's arsenal of threshold decision making,3 in the last decade the Court has turned with increasing frequency to the distinction between facial and as-applied challenges to perform the gatekeeping function.

He said the city doesn't know the developer's plans at this point, but any future action by the city would be "conducted at an open and public meeting with ample opportunities for public participation". Deborah Sivas, a Stanford University professor of environmental law, said the decision affirmed standing legal doctrine.

Its lack of a logical theoretical underpinning has rendered the Court's taxpayer-standing doctrine so incomprehensible that appellate judges do not know what to make of it.