Suggestions(2)
Exact(2)
There are no standards to classify these loadings.
Here, we adopted two standards to classify the 24 simulated models (Table 1).
Similar(58)
The use of OSEM reconstruction for both pre- and post-therapeutic PET examinations (OSEMPET1/OSEMPET2) was used as the "current standard" to classify the therapeutic response of each lesion and compared to other scenarios.
Diagnostic performance, including 95% confidence intervals was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, agreement (proportion in whom both sample-specific results were concordant), predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve where the combined results of culture or PCR was used as the gold standard to classify patients as definite TBM or non TBM.
However, all the above studies have used the US based reference standard to classify SGA [ 28].
VF damage (Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study criteria (2002)) was used as a 'gold-standard' to classify glaucomatous eyes.
The MEC evaluation is our gold standard to classify each participant and evaluate the automatic method proposed in this work.
Firstly, we must adopt a standard to classify different problem areas, so that record parts relevant to these can be distinguished, separately stored and easily queried.
In this sense, our and previous work's results suggest that an effort should be done to establish a 'gold-standard' to classify newly acquired Gb biopsy cases.
Information on maternal and paternal race from the KPSC birth certificate record database was used as the criterion standard to classify children as White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander (PI), American Indian/Alaskan Native (AIAN), other race, or multiple races based on maternal and paternal race information.
On the basis of a histopathological gold standard to classify the inflammatory valve process, the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive and the negative predictive values of direct microscopic examination of imprints and valve culture were 21%, 100 %, 100 %, 60 and 21%, 72%, 38%, 52% respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com