Sentence examples for standards of peer from inspiring English sources

More often, new open access journals have failed to live up to basic standards of peer review and editorial input.

Prof Finch, a sociologist at the University of Manchester, was asked by the government to consult academics and publishers on how the UK could make the scientific research funded by taxpayers available free of charge while maintaining high standards of peer review and without undermining the UK's successful publishing industry.

However, internationally oriented members of the Chinese scientific community, supported by growing pressure from returnees, have been demanding international standards of peer review and scholarly integrity.

Notably, a number of scholarly journals that maintain high standards of peer review and national/international distribution have been developed in recent years that provide biologists with a venue for publication of their pedagogical research.

The Bone & Joint Journal holds a specific annual reviewers' training day in order to ensure that good standards of peer review are upheld, but most journals do not offer this.

There are many advantages to moving to a paperless format, but above all, it will allow EHP to continue to broaden its dissemination and increase the impact of its environmental health information without compromising its high standards of peer review and rigorous editorial oversight.

Bargh lambasted the researchers and the papers' reviewers, and claimed the journal "does not receive the usual high scientific journal standards of peer-review scrutiny".

"In order to ensure that we continue to be compliant with the highest standards of peer-review and publication across the board, SAGE is currently conducting an additional review of our guidance to editors and authors to ensure that it is clear," Sherman says.

The Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guidelines provide a promising framework for crafting publications that can meet the exacting standards of peer-reviewed journals.

Many published papers were flawed, despite leading medical journals' sometimes arrogant insistence on a high standard of peer review.

Instead PLoS relies on PLoS ONE, a high-volume online journal with an arguably lighter standard of peer review, to operate profitably.