standards of objectivity

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "standards of objectivity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing criteria or benchmarks that define impartiality and fairness in analysis or reporting. Example: "In journalism, maintaining high standards of objectivity is essential to ensure that the audience receives unbiased information."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

(By 'objective' here, I mean 'ontologically objective', i.e., mind-independent. This sense should be distinguished from 'epistemologically objective', which implies appeal to epistemological standards of objectivity).

SEP

And Mr. Joynt of Fitch Ratings said his firm was committed to the highest standards of objectivity.

The New York Times

A government-appointed Broadcasting Commission reviews program activities to ensure that standards of objectivity and impartiality are met.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Despite this claim, neither technology nor the standards of objectivity we today take for granted in news gathering play much of a part in the story Perry has to tell in "A Bohemian Brigade".

The New York Times - Books

If semiotics, existentialism, hermeneutics, formalism, structuralism, post-structuralism, deconstruction and post-modernism transparently flout science's standards of objectivity, or if they seek arbitrarily to limit the reach of scientific methods, then naturalism can't take them seriously as knowledge.

The New York Times

According to Rawls, these debates fail to effectively address the problem of ethical disagreements because they adopt inadequate standards of objectivity.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

What postmodernists do claim, he says, is that there is no "independent standard of objectivity".

The New York Times - Arts

But NPR is held to an almost unattainable standard of objectivity and must appeal regularly to a coterie of legislators whose animosity toward it is deep.

The New York Times

Say what you will about traditional media operations, but they usually have a wall between the salesmen and the journalists to make sure there's a standard of objectivity in place.

Vice

Standards of journalistic objectivity date to the nineteenth century.

The New Yorker

The question of how to think about Facebook's role in the news — and whether we should demand the same standards of accuracy, objectivity, transparency and fairness that we expect from traditional outlets — may be the primary puzzle of our new media age.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "standards of objectivity", clearly define what constitutes objectivity within the specific context to avoid ambiguity. For instance, in journalism, it might refer to unbiased reporting, while in scientific research, it might denote verifiable and reproducible results.

Common error

Avoid assuming everyone shares the same understanding of objectivity. Always clarify the specific "standards of objectivity" being applied, as they can vary across different fields and contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "standards of objectivity" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject or object in a sentence. Ludwig examples show its use in contexts discussing ethical considerations, professional guidelines, and scientific methodologies. The phrase specifies criteria or benchmarks for ensuring impartiality.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

50%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "standards of objectivity" is a common and grammatically correct term used to describe the benchmarks and criteria for ensuring impartiality and fairness across various disciplines. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and provides numerous examples from reputable sources. These standards are crucial in fields like journalism, science, and ethics to maintain credibility and trustworthiness. When using this phrase, it's essential to clarify the specific context to avoid ambiguity, as the precise meaning can vary. Alternatives include "objective criteria" and "impartial benchmarks", which can be used depending on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

objective criteria

Focuses on the criteria used to achieve objectivity, omitting the explicit mention of standards.

impartial benchmarks

Replaces "objectivity" with "impartial" and "standards" with "benchmarks", emphasizing fairness.

neutral guidelines

Uses "neutral" and "guidelines" to convey a similar meaning, highlighting lack of bias.

fair principles

Emphasizes fairness as a key component, replacing "standards" with "principles".

unbiased measures

Highlights the absence of bias in the evaluation process.

rigorous metrics

Focuses on the thoroughness and accuracy of the measures used.

ethical norms

Highlights the ethical considerations in maintaining objectivity.

professional code of conduct

Emphasizes the rules and procedures used for impartiality in a specific field.

balanced approach

Indicates consideration for all sides in order to be objective.

fact-based assessment

Stresses reliance on facts rather than opinions.

FAQs

How can "standards of objectivity" be ensured in journalism?

Ensuring "standards of objectivity" in journalism involves presenting facts without personal bias, verifying information from multiple sources, and clearly distinguishing between opinion and news reporting. It often means adhering to a "professional code of conduct".

What are some alternative ways to express "standards of objectivity"?

You can use alternatives such as "objective criteria", "impartial benchmarks", or "neutral guidelines" depending on the context.

Why are "standards of objectivity" important in scientific research?

In scientific research, "standards of objectivity" are crucial for ensuring that findings are reliable, reproducible, and not influenced by personal beliefs or biases. This involves using rigorous methodologies, peer review, and transparent reporting of data. It helps build credibility.

What is the difference between "standards of objectivity" and "standards of fairness"?

"Standards of objectivity" emphasize impartiality and presenting facts without bias, while "standards of fairness" focus on equitable treatment and just outcomes. While related, objectivity centers on unbiased presentation, and fairness centers on equitable application of rules and principles.