'standards of knowledge' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You could use it in a sentence such as, "The school has set high standards of knowledge for its students."
That requires the best standards of knowledge that we have.
To compare standards of knowledge of nurses and GPs.
Paragraphs (d)(1) through (12) of this section also prescribe additional documentation requirements that must be met in certain cases in order to treat a payee as having a specific chapter 4 status and specific standards of knowledge that apply to a particular payee, in addition to the general standards of knowledge set forth in paragraph (e) of this section.
In addition to the standards of knowledge rules indicated in paragraph (e) of this section, a withholding agent will have reason to know that the payee is not an investment entity that does not maintain financial accounts described in § 1.1471-5(f)(2)(v) if its AML due diligence documentation indicates that the payee has financial accounts.
In addition to the standards of knowledge rules indicated in paragraph (e) of this section, a withholding agent will have reason to know that the payee is not a sponsored, closely held investment vehicle described in § 1.1471-5(f)(2)(iii) if its AML due diligence indicates that the payee has in excess of 20 individual investors that own direct and/or indirect interests in the payee.
This makes your standards of knowledge rise.
It's to say something stronger: that depending on the context of inquiry, the standards of knowledge-worthy justification might vary.
Defenders of the epistemic approach to fallacies see them as shortfalls of the standards of knowledge-generating arguments.
The "Dopamine Deficiency Hypothesis" and a considerable number of recent pharmacological studies propose to thoroughly verify and improve the standard of knowledge regarding a possible role of dopamine in the pathogenesis and treatment of depression.
Today, only a fraction of clinical decisions are based upon evidence derived from randomized control trials (RCTs), the gold-standard of knowledge discovery.
The judge must determine how the reform act should be interpreted regarding the standard of knowledge, in other words: What did corporate officials know and when did they know it?
