standards of ignorance

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "standards of ignorance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a set of criteria or benchmarks that reflect a lack of knowledge or understanding in a particular area. Example: "The report highlighted the alarming standards of ignorance prevalent in the community regarding health issues."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

"The prince he has just exhibited high standards of ignorance," Tengetile Hlophe, a co-ordinator of the charity Swaziland For Positive Living, told the BBC's Network Africa programme.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

We see him dispatch Emerson ("set up a new standard of Ignorance in America") and Santayana ("a poseur").

The Guardian - Books

It is more a counter-attack on the "hypocrisy, double standards and ignorance" of those who attack it.

The Economist

Like Giroux we decry the demise of academic standards and are troubled by the emerging culture of ignorance.

Huffington Post

Others saw them as a manifestation of ignorance about the history of Western imperialism, double standards, and stereotyping.

Wikipedia

While O'Neal's garbled, exaggerated approximations of Asian speech insulted Americans, Asian and otherwise, Yao pleaded ignorance to our standards of civility and decorum.

The New Yorker

He said the decision by F.B.I. supervisors in Washington to rebuff the Minneapolis agents, and the supervisors' ignorance of the standards of evidence required for a search warrant, were "inexplicable".

The New York Times

If religious beliefs and opinions are found contrary to the standards of science, they are mere superstitions and imaginations; for the antithesis of knowledge is ignorance, and the child of ignorance is superstition.

Huffington Post

The bliss of ignorance.

The Guardian

Purely out of ignorance.

The New York Times - Sports

"It's been 42 years of ignorance".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "standards of ignorance", ensure you clearly define what constitutes the 'standard' in the context you are using it. Be specific about the area of knowledge or understanding being assessed.

Common error

Avoid using "standards of ignorance" when simply referring to a lack of knowledge in a general sense. The phrase implies a measurable or defined level of ignorance, not just its presence. Use "lack of knowledge" instead for general cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "standards of ignorance" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It denotes a specific level or benchmark related to a lack of knowledge or understanding. Ludwig AI shows examples where it describes the degree of ignorance prevalent in a certain context, especially in areas such as public health and education.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

32%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "standards of ignorance" is a phrase used to describe a measurable level of lacking knowledge in a particular area. Ludwig AI identifies the phrase as grammatically correct and usable, though rare. It often appears in news and media and science, where it serves to criticize and highlight shortcomings. When employing the phrase, ensure the 'standard' is clearly defined and that simpler alternatives aren't more appropriate. The levels of unawareness or degrees of unfamiliarity might be more appropriate in some contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

benchmarks of ignorance

This variation directly replaces "standards" with a synonym while retaining the core meaning.

criteria for ignorance

This option uses "criteria" to indicate a set of measures for assessing ignorance.

yardsticks of ignorance

This phrase employs "yardsticks" as a synonym for standards, emphasizing measurement.

measures of ignorance

This alternative uses "measures" to convey the assessment or quantification of ignorance.

levels of unawareness

This alternative focuses on the lack of awareness as opposed to a measurable standard of ignorance.

scope of unawareness

This version focuses on the range or extent to which someone is not aware.

degrees of unfamiliarity

This option emphasizes a lack of familiarity with a subject, rather than a benchmark of ignorance.

extents of incomprehension

This phrase highlights the inability to understand, shifting from a general lack of knowledge to a specific lack of comprehension.

depths of nescience

This alternative emphasizes the profound lack of knowledge or awareness.

magnitude of unenlightenment

This phrase uses a more metaphorical approach, focusing on the lack of intellectual or spiritual insight.

FAQs

How can "standards of ignorance" be used in a sentence?

You might say, "The report highlighted the alarming "standards of ignorance" prevalent in the community regarding basic financial literacy." This suggests a measurable level of ignorance.

What's a good alternative to "standards of ignorance"?

Consider using phrases like "levels of unawareness", "degrees of unfamiliarity", or "benchmarks of ignorance depending on the specific context.

Is "standards of ignorance" a formal or informal phrase?

"Standards of ignorance" can be used in both formal and informal contexts, but it is more common in analytical or critical discussions, especially in "news and media" or "science".

When is it appropriate to use "standards of ignorance" over a simpler term like "ignorance"?

Use "standards of ignorance" when you want to emphasize that there is a defined or measurable level of ignorance, often used in reports, studies, or critical analyses. If you want to indicate the lack of awareness of something in general, use the single word "ignorance".