Suggestions(1)
Exact(8)
All of these evaluations were conducted using relatively higher-quality reference standards (n = 5; 100%).
Similarly, although antibiotic resistance was normally distributed, resource use among Streptomyces with low (resisting 3 5 standards, n = 58) and high (resisting 8 10 standards; n = 62) resistance capacities was also compared using Student's t-tests.
Pesticide recoveries from the independent standards (n = 10) were within 2% of the reported values, with CVs < 2.1%.
Based on internal standards (N = 165, tyrosin; Roth, Germany), the analytical precision (±1 SD) equalled ±0.16‰ and ±0.29‰ for δN and δC, respectively.
However, the number of susceptible Streptomyces varied considerably for individual standards (n = 2 to n = 213; Additional file 1), which may limit our ability to detect significant relationships in cases where there are very few susceptible isolates.
In the analyses of weight and gestational age, multiple births were excluded as these often are delivered before term and are small for gestational age when compared to singleton standards (N = 29,399).
Similar(52)
For 15Nair, the gas was calibrated against atmospheric N2 and IAEA standards (N-1, N-2, and N-3).
To eliminate the possible influence of co-elution and other factors on the measurement of the LMWHs, a mixture consisting of twelve pure standards (n-C6, benzene, n-C7, MCH, toluene, n-C8, ethylbenzene, o-xylene, n-C9, n-C10, n-C11, and n-C12) was selected here to replace a real oil.
Two internal standards (n-octane and nonyl acetate, each 200 ng in 10 mL methylene chloride) were added to each sample.
The linear retention indices were calculated on the basis of the retention times of the compounds and the retention times of the retention index standards (n-alkanes).
After a 6 h collection period, volatiles were eluted with 150 μl methylene chloride and two internal standards (n-octane and nonyl acetate, each 200 ng in 10 ml methylene chloride) were added.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com