Although we did not predict specific differences between the different types of inferences, we used MP, MT, DA, and AC problems to see whether they are differently affected by the content of the problem and also to design our material in accordance with the standards in reasoning research.
This line of thought closely parallels, of course, Laudan's appeal to further "ampliative standards" of reasoning in response to holist underdetermination in Section 2, above.
More importantly, the peculiar performance of low social capital individuals, in agreement with standard economic reasoning, adds to the knowledge of the circumstances that makes the crowding out/in of intrinsic motivation likely to occur.
Implementation of the reasoning component requires a language that is ideal in specifying what kind of reasoning to be performed rather than how the reasoning is performed.
This standpoint, as mentioned in the foregoing, relies on the discursive mode of reasoning to understand reality, while presupposing an ego-consciousness as the standard referential point.
Tait, in contrast to Parsons, rejects the aspect of representability in intuition as the hallmark of the finitary; instead he takes finitary reasoning to be "a minimal kind of reasoning presupposed by all non-trivial mathematical reasoning about numbers".
Research in physiotherapy has also highlighted that practitioners move between reasoning about patients physical complaints using analytic or non-analytic reasoning and engaging with the patient or their carer (narrative reasoning) to understand the impact of the presenting complaint [ 8].
If we consider an iteroparous organism that does not senesce, the standard default situation in reasoning about the evolution of senescence, selection pressure is an exponentially declining function of age.
Doctors use standard memory and reasoning tests to diagnose dementia, along with symptoms reported by the patient and family members.
In yet another contrasting position, the three methodological approaches put forward by Dunn et al. [ 4] interpret coherence with reference to argumentative standards in 'real-world' practical reasoning, rather than in terms of any alignment between moral theory and empirical facts.
