Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
The cancer program standards for CoC-accredited programs may also influence the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of data reported to the NCDB.
In short, our findings suggest that the central COC factors for establishing high-quality care may be those elements that form the preconditions or building blocks for COC as well as staff-related COC.
As the CoC reviews its program standards for 2011, it is certain that an increased focus on quality improvement will significantly influence the nature of surveys and that surveys will likely emphasize validation of data reported to the NCDB rather than a review of facility operational and structural characteristics.
This prediction suggests MAE as the most appropriate filler for COC, followed by MoS2 and graphene.
The functional architecture of the proposed components are given in Fig. 2 for COC and in Fig. 3 for UNOC.
Both the preconditions for COC factor and staff-related COC factor showed similar relationships.
Further research should test whether having the preconditions for COC and staff-related COC in place affects outcomes.
Preconditions for COC was additionally associated with having increased quality of life and fewer symptoms whilst staff-related COC was additionally related to empowerment (BUES).
The first factor, named preconditions for COC, consisted of access, range, information and individual progress.
Instead, service users rated those elements that constitute preconditions for COC most highly.
Preconditions for COC were additionally related to symptoms and quality of life.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com