"standardized terminology" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to a set of terms that are commonly used and accepted. For example, "All the medical staff were trained on the hospital's standardized terminology so that they could communicate efficiently with each other."
The need to develop standardized terminology is thus evident.
The proposed approach focuses on how to support information autonomy that allows the individual team members to keep their own preferred languages or information models rather than requiring them all to adopt standardized terminology.
After removal of duplicates and content analysis, 66 unique research priorities were identified within 7 broad categories: 1) standardized terminology, 2) measurement and reporting, 3) epidemiology, 4) understanding human and environmental factors related to patient safety, 5) patient perspective, 6) impact, and 7) interventions.
Author and Contributor Identity Disambiguation e. Standardized Terminology f.
Therefore it is very important to set standardized terminology that would be used in medical reports.
These include establishment of priority in the source of information if there are multiple sources of information and having standardized terminology [ 12].
This study investigated the development of a community-focused curriculum integrating primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention and nursing standardized terminologies as an organizing infrastructure.
A coherent curriculum was designed using a community-focused approach; primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies; and standardized terminologies as the organizing infrastructure to teach and apply nursing practice.
The aim was to clarify and standardize terminology and definitions of measurement properties by reaching consensus among a group of experts and to develop a taxonomy of measurement properties relevant for evaluating health instruments.
This classification of bite marks in foodstuffs and inanimate objects has been recommended and, in fact, there seems to be no other attempt to standardize terminology for this type of evidence (Rivera-Mendoza et al. 2017).
It establishes minimum acceptable technical parameters for prostate mpMRI, simplifies and standardizes terminology and content of reports, and provides assessment categories that summarize levels of suspicion or risk of clinically significant prostate cancer that can be used to assist selection of patients for biopsies and management.
