Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
Because sampling was not proportional at any level (eg, age groups were sampled with differing proportions, cases without CRC or HGD were under sampled), estimators were standardised to the target population using the direct method 17 18 and inverse probability weighting.
It should be standardised.
Was its wording standardised?
It is very standardised.
Only in one sense are they standardised.
Which, really, of course, means: not standardised south-east.
Margins come down, things get standardised and commoditised.
High-stakes standardised tests don't improve schools.
It is also recommending standardised, anonymous job application forms.
Management is not standardised.
Mean standardised uptake values.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com