Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Figure 20 Raw confidence vs. Standardised confidence.
It should also be noted that where standardised confidence intervals do not overlap there may be a true difference in the comparative sensitivity of the outcome metric (i.e. A level tariff vs UKCAT score) to the sociodemographic variable.
Similar(58)
Abbreviations: ASR Age standardised rates, CI confidence intervals, c. cancers.
AIS, Abbreviated Injury Scale; β, standardised coefficient; CI, confidence interval; ISS, Injury Severity Score.
The treatment of these 721 patients was not standardised, and the confidence interval is wider than that of the 3.0-4.5 3.0-4.5hour becohortof the smaller sample.
Abbreviations: SEER Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results, IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer, IACR International Association of Cancer Registries, SIR standardised incidence ratio, CI confidence interval.
> -wrap-foot> Standardised factor loadings (95%% confidence intervals) are given on the diagonals and correlations on the off-diagonals aScalars were included on physical aggression and depression to account for variance differences between the sexes The negative life events model is presented in Fig. 4 and Table 8 in the appendix.
> -wrap-foot> Standardised factor loadings (95%% confidence intervals) are given on the diagonals and correlations on the off-diagonals aScalars were included on physical aggression and depression to account for variance differences between the sexes The paternal negativity model included scalars on physical aggression and depression.
p = statistical significance; OR = standardised odds ratio (standardised beta); CI = confidence intervals.
8 For collaborative care, there is some supportive evidence from other contexts, including the developing world, 9 10 but uncertainty around the standardised effect size in trials in the United Kingdom (standardised mean difference 0.24, 95% confidence interval −0.060 to 0.547) and elsewhere.
At 12 month follow-up, mean PHQ-9 score was 1.36 points lower (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 2.64, P=0.04) in participants receiving collaborative care than in those receiving usual care (standardised effect size 0.28 (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.52)).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com