Exact(5)
In this article, we describe the results of a carefully designed split sample experiment that allowed for comparison of a standard dichotomous-choice referendum treatment to a treatment that included the option of responding unsure to the contingent valuation question in addition to the standard vote in favor and vote against response categories.
The in/out Brexit referendum in the UK was no such standard vote.
The standard vote choice question, which dates to 1935 when George Gallup first asked about presidential preferences, is deliberately designed to obfuscate the number of undecided voters.
She apparently was adamant about not just giving a standard "vote for Hillary" speech, but instead wanted to share her very personal thoughts about the disastrous week Trump has been having.
In the September 1996 poll, however, Gallup abandoned the standard vote choice question, and instead first asked voters if they had even made their decision as to which candidate they would support.
Similar(55)
Applying a standard vote-counting rule to the data, we determine a complete ranking of the action items.
This distinguishes voting for non-binding proposals from standard voting for binding proposals, where some information is always conveyed.
(In buildings with standard voting, a shareholder with 500 shares still gets 2,500 votes, but can cast only 500 for each director spot open for election).
"Had we based our forecast on the standard voting-intention question, it likely would have had the Liberal Democrats winning 10 seats," he said.
They argued that Mr. Page and Mr. Brin, who already hold super-voting Class B stock, would become even more entrenched if Google started issuing nonvoting C shares rather than standard voting A shares.
Ben Lauderdale on the FiveThirtyEight site said he believed constituency polls from Lord Ashcroft that asked about specific MPs rather than parties "performed poorly and overstated the extent to which tactical voting would enable the Liberal Democrats to hold onto seats they would lose on the standard voting-intention question.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com