"standard reasoning" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use "standard reasoning" to describe the typical logic or line of thinking used in a particular situation. For example, "The judge upheld the conviction due to standard reasoning that the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant."
Lightweight description logics are knowledge representation formalisms characterised by the low complexity of their standard reasoning tasks.
It then illustrates how the new models support standard reasoning algorithms, provide simple models for previously difficult situations, and suggest interesting new analyses based on change or non-change in scene topology.
This result is in agreement with the standard reasoning about synchronization and leakiness.
Another standard reasoning task is the discovery of information that is not explicitly stated in the ontology.
It is argued that in the majority of cases in standard reasoning tasks, subjects use non-monontonic logical forms that are based on closed world assumptions.
Thus from (3.8), (3.10) and the standard reasoning of removing exceptional set (see [2, Lemma 1.1.1]) we deduce σ (f) = σ (F).
By standard reasonings as those for the case of classical complex Favard-Szász-Mirakjan operator (see the proof of Theorem 1.8.6 in[3]), combined with those for the Bernstein-Stancu polynomials (see[17] or the proof of Theorem 1.6.5 in[3]), the present proof finally reduces to the proof of the fact that ∥ [ ( α − βz ) f ′ ( z ) + z 2 f ′′ ( z ) ] ( p ) ∥ r > 0 Open image in new window.
Because this test is unannounced, the group lowers its standards, reasoning that the films will not be a clinic's best.
Contrary to standard assumptions, reasoning is often an emotional process.
Some of the evidence from individual countries conforms to standard economic reasoning.
Again, standard neuropsychological reasoning would incorrectly imply that the underlying organization is modular.
