"standard for publication" is an appropriate phrase for written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to the requirements that must be met for some published work. For example, "To be published in a major journal, researchers must meet the high standard for publication set by the editor."
The standard for publication in Information Technology & Tourism is that a paper must make a substantive contribution to the understanding of the nature and/or role of technology within the context of tourism and hospitality.
The incorporation of preprints from the arXiv into ADS means that the search engine can return the most current research available, with the caveat that preprints may not have been peer reviewed or proofread to the required standard for publication in the main journals.
Once the above issues are carefully addressed, the improved manuscript is expected to meet the standard for publication in the Biology Direct.
Indeed, a recent statement by The Endocrine Society had attempted to implement a policy toward introducing LC-MS as the diagnostic standard for publication of steroid measurements (8), although this position was later relaxed because many laboratories do not have the technology to achieve such accurate analysis (10).
"It still met the standards for publication in an academic journal," she said.
If the recordings are released, the AP would review the content and determine what, if any of it would meet the news cooperative's standards for publication.
Tom King Knoxville, Tenn., Feb. 25, 2008 ● I will leave it to the experts as to when a story meets the proper standards for publication.
Or just poor choice of words on the part of the staff?" Carolyn Ryan, Metro's political editor, said: "Without disclosing details of our sourcing, I can say that the original lede reflected the reporting we had confirmed to our standards for publication, at that point in time.
To our knowledge this is the first publication trying to provide this additional information in the RInChI standard, and is intended to contribute to the discussion of standards for publication of research data in machine readable formats.
Studies that use genetic markers as instruments generally draw biological justification from results of published candidate gene studies, which as discussed are controversial.20 The journal Behavior Genetics recently adopted strict standards for publication of candidate gene studies (Hewitt 2012).
The presence of publications from the NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks at elevated levels of the journal hierarchy confirmed the scientific output was of high quality and researchers' work was meeting rigorous peer review standards for publication.
