Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(12)
Moreover, lack of proper control analytical methods which would be considered as a "gold standard" for functional analysis of microarray data unable direct justification our assumption that the consensus pathways identified by multiple analyses are more likely discriminative than those identified by individual methods.
GO has become the de facto standard for functional annotation [ 12].
Gene Ontology (GO) terms are widely used as the standard for functional annotation.
There are variety of tools, but no "gold standard" for functional pathway analysis of high-throughput genome-scale data [ 138].
Planar scintigraphy using 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin (MAA) is a long-established imaging standard for functional lung perfusion evaluation.
Maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) test is highly reproducible, and it is considered a "gold standard" for functional capacity assessment in athletes and sick individuals.
Similar(48)
Motor function measurements were collected in accordance with the "Appraisal standards for functional measures in independent elderly people" set by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan.
A number of rival food giants have even banded together into a coalition (dubbed "Smart Choices") to agree on common labelling standards for functional foods.All this sounds impressive, but there are two factors that could yet trip things up: consumer scepticism and regulatory disapproval.
Such challenges do not impugn the validity of standard arguments for functional localization from deficits.
This, and the fact that there are no "standard" protocols for functional analysis of microarray experiments could lead to tuning the analysis procedure to fit the expected results.
The standard mechanisms for functional and structural annotation of genomes are less than perfect and prediction methods that rely on sequence homology have limitations for inferring the structural and functional properties of some genes [1], [2], [3].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com