Sentence examples for standard error minimum from inspiring English sources

Cultures were treated concurrently and cell viability was evaluated (means ± standard error, minimum of n = 3).

Cultures were treated concurrently with varying concentrations of ZnO NP for 24 h and cell viability was evaluated (means ± standard error, minimum of n = 3).

ROS generation was evaluated in Jurkat cells at 6, 18, and 24 h following treatment with nZnO/PBS (PBS) and nZnO – FBS/PBS (FBS/PBS) stock dispersions using MitoSOX red and flow cytometry (means ± standard error, minimum of n = 3).

The descriptive statistics included the mean, standard deviation, standard error, minimum and maximum for continuous variables.

Descriptive statistics were performed, including the mean, standard deviation, standard error, minimum value, median, and maximum value for continuous variables.

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard error, minimum and maximum for quantitative variables; sample size and % per modality for qualitative variables) of the variables were generated for all participants.

The mean ± standard error (minimum-maximum) copy number in tumor samples was 224.8 ± 39.4 (range: 44-613) versus 0.5 (range: 0.02-1) inormalal cells (p = 0.023).

Nevertheless, the range of acrylamide levels in the samples was wide, as can be seen from the standard errors, minima, maxima and variances (Table 1).

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard error (SE), minimum, maximum) were computed, and graphical representations were generated using the average marker value (±1 SE) for each day and group.

The mean ± standard error (SE) minimum weekly temperature during the winter portion of the study was 14.3 ± 0.5°C.

The mean, standard deviation, standard error and minimum and maximum CT values for the three groups are shown in Table  2 for the four ROIs.