Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The means +/− standard error (error bars) were determined for all appropriate data.
For all appropriate data the average +/− the standard error (error bars) are presented.
Despite the broad set of RT measures in Figure 4 (all CV measures in the CNP database spanning SMNM, DDT, ANT, SCWT, SR, and SST), with few exceptions the differences are greater than the standard error (error bars).
Nevertheless, all three methods had a very good within-subject CV, showing that the within-subject standard error (error due to method) ranged by only 0.74% to 2.73% from the mean.
Similar(56)
Table 1 Calibration and validation statistics of average monthly simulated and gauged flows Period (Monthly) Standard error % error R 2 ENS Observed Simulated Calibration 1987–1994 7.72 8.3 2.2 0.8 0.69 Validation 1995 2000 1995 200086 −7.54 0.77 0.54.
Standard error indicated in error bars.
Error bars: standard error of the mean.
The error bars indicate standard error.
Error bars signify standard error (n = 3).
Error bar represents standard error (n = 6).
Bars represent mean start and length of flowering with standard error for error bars.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com