Suggestions(1)
Exact(43)
The medical records of identified patients were reviewed and data were extracted using standard data extraction form.
Data were extracted using standard data extraction form and the response to rGH therapy was defined as a gain of ≥ 0.3 standard deviation score (SDS) of height per year.
Data, including measures of study bias, were extracted using a standard data extraction sheet (copy included as Additional file 2) by two of the authors (OM and KN).
A standard data extraction form was used to extract data on study characteristics (title, author, year and study methods), intervention design, effectiveness and context factors.
Three authors (PW, RH and SL) independently extracted information using standard data extraction forms as described in the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions [ 31].
Two of the three authors (CC, DS, PS) independently extracted data using a standard data extraction form that was tested, piloted and modified for the current review.
Similar(17)
One reviewer (SH) extracted the data by using a standard data-extraction form.
Information from each trial was separately extracted by two authors (Chen YY and Li YM) using standard data-extraction forms.
Data were extracted from published papers by one reviewer using a standard data-extraction database and then verified independently by a second reviewer.
Data extraction was independently performed by two authors using standard data-extraction forms.
Data extraction was performed with use of standard data-extraction forms.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com