Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
It was found that for low-B containing (11 ppm and 31 ppm) materials, the precisions (2 s) of 11B/10B can be improved by a factor of 2 10 by using the newly designed X-skimmer cone and Jet sample cone, compared to that of using the standard cones.
Lastly, the mean distance error from the true positive GTDP cones to the gold standard cones was 0.20 ± 0.26 µm.
If an automatically identified cone did not have any gold standard cones within the 1.75 µm distance, then it was tagged as a false positive.
This table shows that after taking into consideration all correlated data, our GTDP method correctly detected 99.0% of the cones, compared to the Garrioch et al. 2012 method which detected 94.5% of the gold standard cones; this difference was found to be significant (Z = 15.0, p<0.00015.0,
Similar(56)
The test consists of dropping a standard cone into the sample of grease being tested.
In our considerations, we need the standard cone (Ksubset X) by K=bigl{ uin[0,1]:u(t geq0,0leq tleq1bigr}.
Fire behavior of pure polyethylene has been investigated by performing flammability analysis using a standard cone calorimeter.
Bone microstructural features were investigated by means of standard Cone Beam X-ray micro-CT, Synchrotron Radiation micro-CT and histology.
The three summary displays included a standard cone of uncertainty, which had a mean line, a cone without the mean line, and a cone in which the color saturation corresponded to the probability distribution of the ensemble data.
A new experiment has been designed within the framework of a standard cone calorimeter to enable inert atmosphere, radiation-driven gasification of coupon-sized solid samples under thoroughly controlled, near-one-dimensional heating conditions.
Cone penetration is expressed in units of 0.1 mm, the penetration depth of a standard cone under a 200 g load into the asphalt mortar sample after a 5-s loading time at a certain temperature.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com