Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(37)
Differences were detected relative to aspect and stand type but variation among sites was also significant.
Details of breast height diameter, basal area and height structure are given for each stand type.
At the plot level, the main explanatory variable was the stand type (pure oak, pure pine and mixed).
For all species except one, the variable stand type predicted higher occurrence on clear-cuts than in forest stands.
In non-salvaged sites, fire severity had a significant effect on composition changes, and the effect depended on stand type.
Salvage treatment had a significant effect on post-fire composition changes and the effect depended on stand type.
Similar(23)
Species composition differed significantly between the two stand types.
Four different stand types, based on species composition, were created (Table 1).
The models are based on about 60,000 diameter increment and survival observations in different stand types.
Overall, the hardwood dominated stand types showed greater growth when compared to the softwood dominated ones.
Assemblages of Leiodidae (round fungus beetles) had similar composition in all three stand types.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com