Harry came to me in a dream last night and TOLD me my stance on Scottish Independence is correct.
Rod Walters Abergavenny, Monmouthshire Polly Toynbee is correct to say that the UK government's stance on the refugee crisis is embarrassing (Opinion, 4 September).
The assumption is as follows: if a conventional poll is correct, and if the usage of Twitter is independent of the referendum stance, by applying age weighting on poll results, we should get the same result as our Twitter stance timeline.
Gardner criticizes us for invoking other evolutionary processes (e.g. drift) as part of ultimate explanations, but his attribution of this "error" to our reciprocal causation stance is obviously not correct, since Dickins and Barton, who reject our position, make the same "error".
I know that my stance may not be correct for many of you, and I'm okay with that.
The correct stance is that while one is delighted to be on intimate terms with the royal families of Europe, one is fiercely proud of the Revolution, Valley Forge, Bill of Rights, etc.
The correct political stance is to give President Obama wide latitude in choosing his subordinates, and then to dispute them on the key substantive issues.
This stance is fully actualised.
