For example, we defined active days as days where some group interaction took place, (e.g. stakeholders being added, ideas being posted, comments added to discussions).
Furthermore, several stakeholder spokes were added to highlight and represent diverse interests relevant to the JJ context throughout the process of phased change already included in EPIS: (1) advocacy groups, (2) researchers, (3) community-based organizations, and (4) service systems.
In the fourth phase, the consolidation and transformation phase, inclusion of information feedback loops and the continuous assessment of client and stakeholder needs were added.
In many instances the networks could be considered relevant stakeholders in and of themselves, and were added to the framework.
Some additional questions were added following consultations with stakeholders.
During phase II activity, seven of these strategies were selected by stakeholder groups as potential 'best practice' material, to which six distinct strategies were added on to these from 'ideal scenarios' that stakeholders thought could improve current practice.
Twenty-one disciplines were identified in this manner, and were added to the framework as stakeholder groups within the categories of 'Research community', and 'Professionals and practitioners'.
Subsequently, stakeholder groups related to these disciplines within other categories were added to the framework.
Compared to case study 2, step 5 - identification of stakeholders - was added.
Furthermore, this dependency on external CIS stakeholders had to be added to the lack of internal mobilization of CIS end-users.
