Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
However, it has been shown that these different expectations did not result in differences in the various stakeholders' scoring in a MSF process [ 10].
Similar(59)
When stakeholders score the different policy options they also record the reasons for these scores.
As highlighted in our study, stakeholders scored the evidence very differently, depending on their personal background.
Through a weighting of stakeholders' scores, 25 ES indicators for the Atlantic forest were obtained.
In NGGL, three potential drivers, namely legal compliance, tax incentives and unique financial position (Score: 1.0) were ranked weakest behind the expectations of internal stakeholders (Score: 3.0) and industry peer pressure and mimicry (Score: 2.0).
Managers, insurers and policy makers highly value these innovations, emphasizing their benefits, while the other stakeholder groups score these innovations lowly.
Accordingly, the aforesaid algorithm rated suggested BCMPs by three groups of stakeholders and a factor scoring method was then used to classify 94 proposed practices in three categories.
This process engages multiple stakeholders and allows for scoring that limits influence of strong-minded individuals on the rest of the scorers and quantitatively determines research priorities and degree of agreement or disagreement between experts.
In GFG, as many as eight (8) potential drivers were thought to be weak or none determinants of CSR involvement: internal stakeholders' expectations, (Score: 3.0) and host communities' expectations (Score: 2.2).
The separation of weighting and scoring by different stakeholders can result in disagreement [ 34].
Teams that target most/all relevant arts stakeholders may score more highly, at your discretion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com