Sentence examples for stakeholders reaction from inspiring English sources

Stated preference (SP) experiments are useful as a basis for DCM to study policy acceptance in terms of stakeholders' reaction to policy change.

Nevertheless, for a successful participatory decision-making process, it is important not only to forecast stakeholders' reaction to policy change, but also to predict the outcome of an interaction process aimed at consensus building.

Empirical survey data are necessary to estimate behavioural models capable of forecasting stakeholders' reactions to alternative policies based on agents' stated preferences [18, 19, 20, 21].

This was a way of both sharing results and collecting additional data in the form of stakeholders' reactions.

We present one such tool – the Greenhouse Gas Regional Inventory Project (GRIP) – and discuss stakeholder reaction to this interactive computer-based approach.

While unethical behavior might be motivated by cost-cutting and increased short-term profits through cheating, a negative stakeholder reaction to such behavior may offset all apparent profit-related benefits of unethical behavior.

Due to the stakeholder reaction by consumers, ethical behavior should increase a firm's market share because consumers perceive the firm's products as being made under ethically impeccable conditions and reward the firm through higher purchases (Auger et al. 2003).

Such CSR practices may appear as selfless actions, but they have the potential to benefit firms through positive stakeholder reactions beneficial to the organization.

SCM research distinguishes between "ordinary supply chain risks" that are connected to the material and financial flow and "sustainability-related supply chain risks" that are triggered by stakeholder reactions (Hofmann et al. 2014: 167).

Our modeling framework is flexible enough to allow adaptation to each of the study sites, capturing the essential features of the respective natural and anthropogenic land use changes and stakeholder reactions.

This article reports the results of an experiment designed to (i) test the effects of these two strategies on individuals' trust in a company accused of corruption, and (ii) determine whether and how evidence of the company's guilt influences stakeholder reactions to its trust repair message.