Suggestions(1)
Exact(12)
However, deliberation was limited to the five key stakeholders mentioned above, each of which took varying degrees of risk and for a time profited handsomely.
Stakeholders mentioned a number of key factors that were necessary for the success of model.
First of all, stakeholders mentioned that there is no financial reason to cooperate.
Stakeholders mentioned a range of physical and psychological conditions affecting humanitarian entrants and older migrants.
Stakeholders mentioned that Home-based programmes had a positive impact on the community by decreasing domestic violence.
Some community stakeholders mentioned long distances to CHPS compounds as a reason for their non-involvement in the skilled delivery program.
Similar(48)
Moreover, stakeholders mention the aim to promote historical forest management such as coppice or coppice with standards for energy wood if native tree species are used (Germany).
Furthermore, stakeholders mention the lack of professional workforce (Finland) and the problem of outsourcing or export of energy wood production: "If we look at how the forests are threatened in general: they are being harvested and the wood is donated to other countries how many workplaces might we have at home instead?" (Slovenia: practitioner group).
The administrator's letter to stakeholders mentions that its assets will be sold, but does not indicate to whom or mention Another World assets by name.
Stakeholders mention 'assessment of severity and suicide risk', 'accounting for social factors', 'being well trained in depression care' and 'offering a range of treatment options' more often than 'funding longer consultations'.
[insurer] At the same time, stakeholders mention that the formation of a stroke service specifically for stroke patients might not result in optimal patient-centred care; "Creating a specific stroke service might be attractive for some patients, however this results in the care provider focussing only on the 'stroke' elements.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com