Sentence examples for stakeholders high from inspiring English sources

Parsimony: Scripts should not include any information about those elements that are not relevant to the stakeholders' high level requirements.

The research undertaken in the IPPHEAE project explored plagiarism-related aspects for three major stakeholders, high rank academics, teaching faculty and students at bachelor and master's degree level rather than doctoral, post-doctoral.

Common requirements for mobile telehealth applications include the need to support multiple stakeholders, high levels of connectivity between users, real-time interaction, bidirectional communication channels for exchanging diverse data types, computationally intensive processing and security.

Stakeholders' high priority rankings reflect topics posing significant burden to patients with CKD or at risk of CKD, and aspects of CKD care for which there is significant uncertainty regarding effectiveness.

All the companies taking part in the project demonstrate the following features (a general trend with varying degrees): low dependence on external stakeholders and high dependence on "mixed" stakeholders, e.g., CEO, Marketing and Sales department; medium-high initiative of R&D projects participation; orientation towards short-term, focused cooperation and operational technology application.

"Our stakeholders have high expectations of the way we operate.

The organisation's new chief executive, Lars-Christer Olsson, has made it his goal to keep the football pyramid intact and to maintain the balance of power between national and club stakeholders.Moreover, high on Mr Olsson's "to do" list is the creation of regulations requiring clubs to field up to six players who have been through the clubs' development system in UEFA competitions.

Surveys revealed that stakeholders placed high value on all ecosystem services, with regulating and cultural services seen as more important than provisioning services.

The cooperative procedure between limited stakeholders with high willingness to compromise largely precludes the possibility of technology leaps and results in remaining in a business-as-usual trajectory, the largest shortcoming of the European model of regulation[99].

The main question addressed by this article is how to adapt the responsive evaluation (RE) approach to an intervention context characterized by repetition of ineffective interventions, ambiguous intervention action theories among stakeholders, and high complexity.

All stakeholders report high levels of satisfaction with the quality of the project outputs.