Sentence examples for stakeholders choose from inspiring English sources

An effort was made to provide an easy-to-use tool in order to reach a wide audience and help horticulture stakeholders choose efficient options to mitigate the environmental impacts of protected crops.

Then, to depict the verb category, the stakeholders chose an animated icon, simulating a running man (Figure 9).

Scientists were more likely to show a change in the level of qualitative hazard interpreted from the different maps than stakeholders (Pearson χ 2 = 7.987, df = 2, α = 0.018), with 40.0% of scientists choosing two hazard levels among the three maps, and 3.3% choosing three, and 25.0%, and 0.0% of stakeholders choosing two and three levels of hazard, respectively.

When asked for their preference of one over the other, a majority of stakeholders chose eCRF.

The stakeholders chose to form two committees – a coordinating committee made up of school heads and ministry officials that would ensure broad-based support and integration of the new topic into the existing curriculum and an eight-member curriculum committee made up of Haitian nurse educators, nurse trainers and one nurse HIV/AIDS expert to draft the new curriculum.

First, the tool was reviewed by four individuals with expertise in the TPB and in KTE targeted at health policymakers and stakeholders (chosen from among those we consulted in devising the items) to ensure the items appropriately assess the four TPB constructs that together predict the target behaviour (i.e., the use of research evidence in policymaking).

The modelling approach assumes that stakeholders initially choose the policy they prefer according to the associated utility function.

In this model, all stakeholders ultimately choose to sit on the same side of the education reform table, working toward the same goal of improving outcomes for students, rather than meeting across the table as adversaries working from opposing positions.

Some of these laboratories are presently running high-resolution sequencing activities in parallel with classical laboratory exercises, and understanding their cost-benefit analysis will be crucial to develop the justification required to convince stakeholders to choose a coordinated path.

As highlighted above, demography, yield loss or patient recovery and economic criteria are equally important alternative outputs for facilitating stakeholders to choose the best strategies for efficient chemical control.

Therefore, stakeholders might choose to develop their own independent health-based drinking-water standards for molybdenum or, at the very least, continue using the former WHO guideline of 70 μg/L published in the previous (3rd) edition of the Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality [ 65].