The acknowledgement and management of this standpoint was deemed essential in reconciling potential stakeholder difference.
While some key diseases (respiratory diseases) were reported as important by all groups of stakeholders, differences in other priority diseases for regional or district, village, and household levels emphasize the need for increased communication between policymakers and pastoralists.
This conclusion is supported by significant inter-stakeholder differences (see below).
[P2/Ministry of Health] Turning to the health providers and community stakeholders, fundamental differences were highlighted in terms of the existing weak points and actions to overcome them.
In most cases, disputes exist among different stakeholders due to differences in their interests, values, and goals (i.e., short-term vs. long-term goals or recreational over subsistence needs).
The Stakeholder model highlighted differences between the communities in terms of power over agenda-setting and conflict between politicians and bureaucrats over policy solutions to alcohol-related harm.
Other than the range of stakeholders involved, the power differences between these stakeholders had a major influence in the priority setting process in hospitals (Gibson et al. 2005).
In particular, reporting should "state the underlying basis used for specifying the target difference: An important difference as judged by a stakeholder or A realistic difference based on current knowledge or Both an important and a realistic difference".
A principal component analysis based on survey respondent rankings grouped barriers into: resistance to change among stakeholders, concerns about differences between traditional subdivisions and conservation subdivisions, concerns about consumer demand, and misperceptions about construction costs.
Stakeholders noted significant differences between attributional and consequential LCA 1 in terms of levels of uncertainty, system boundaries and methodology.
