Exact(3)
Intervention: Exposure to PSWD, twice daily, on days 2, 3, and 4. Main Outcome Measure: After crystal violet staining (day 5), optical density (cell number) was determined spectrophotometrically.
Although there were still iodine molecules in the solution on day 5, the staining effect appeared to be stagnant in the latter stages of the first-round staining (day 5-day 10), and also for the rest of first-round staining (~ day 23).
A small portion (from none to < 5%, varied among donors) of Day 0 cells showed weak p53 staining (Day 0, Fig. 2B, red), while a bigger portion of cells (from 10%to30%0%, varied among donors) were positive for p16 (Day 0, Fig. 2C, red), suggesting that these cells might be undergoing senescence in vivo.
Similar(57)
2) Similar procedures were used for the comparison of IPC groups subject to SOD or vehicle treatment (3 groups), and for the comparison of staining at day 3, day 6 and control.
Furthermore, a greater number of B16F10 cells were detected in the lung tissues of RNF13-KO mice by frozen section at 6 h and 24 h or by H&E staining at day 2 and day 4.
The osteogenic phenotype of MSCs was confirmed by the increase in ALP activity at day 10 and positive Alizarin Red staining at day 21 for cells cultured in OM, but not BM.
Demyelinating plaques were detected by LFB staining at day 7, and spinal cords showed a similar pattern of demyelination at day 30, but the number and area of plaques was larger and 4(d)).
Fluorescence images showing HRS expression and Sox17 antibody staining at day 6 of differentiation.
We observed normal osteoclast recruitment as indicated by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining at day 10 post-fracture (Fig. 6A,E).
Cell viability, as obtained by the GLP-1 production rate of stem cells and by the SYBR Green/propidium iodide staining at day 1 post-explantation, is also shown.
Collagen I staining at day 3 was minimally found around cells inside samples and only for samples implanted with human or rat cells; although, after 7 days, this minimal staining was found inside all samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com