Exact(1)
This staging of questionnaires has been successfully used in other studies and is believed to generate a better response rate then sending a longer initial questionnaire [ 16].
Similar(59)
Two stages of questionnaires asked participants to rate the relative importance of suggested checklist items; the second questionnaire was refined based on feedback from the previous one.
To classify participants according to their stage-of-change, questionnaires have been developed to assess readiness to change in individuals.
The questionnaire's preliminary versions were developed according to the standard stages of questionnaire validation [ 20, 21], including evaluation of content validity, item clarity and construct validity [ 15].
At this stage of questionnaire development, a change score of −0.1 to −0.2 is the most appropriate estimation for determining a threshold for treatment response.
This approach has been tried by relatively few instrument developers [ 39- 41], largely due to the time and budgetary resources associated with the initial stages of questionnaire design.
It should be noted, however, that no restriction on mMRC was used in recruiting patients with COPD for the qualitative stage of questionnaire development where the 37-items used in this study were developed [ 12].
This is further supported by distribution-based estimations of the MID using methods described by Revicki et al 8 and Wyrwich et al. 9 Thus, a threshold of −0.1 to −0.2 for the score range of 1 4, supported by anchor-based and distribution-based methods, seems reasonable at this stage of questionnaire development.
Participants who reported to be smokers at 12 months filled in a standardized stage-of-change questionnaire [ 20].
A 4-stage process of questionnaire development with international experts in migrant reproductive health and research resulted in the MFMCQ, a questionnaire measuring key aspects of migrant-sensitive maternity care.
Participants (n = 105) completed sociodemographic and stage of change questionnaires.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com