Suggestions(5)
Exact(3)
Interestingly, the difference in both of our findings may be partially attributed to the TNM stage proportion of the samples.
A previously published score (CAPRA) (Cooperberg et al, 2005) based on Gleason score, PSA, clinical stage, proportion of positive cores, and age was computed for each patient.
In univariate analysis, nodal metastasis was associated with the presence of any LVSI (95.9% vs. 56.7%, P < 0.001), tumor stage (proportion of LVSI presenting tumor, T1 vs. T2 vs. T3: 23.1% vs. 50% vs. 90.2%, P < 0.001), and high-grade serous carcinoma (86.0% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.004) (Table 2, Fig. 1A C).
Similar(57)
For dichotomous data outcomes (proportion of participants with gametocytes or asexual stages, proportion of participants infectious to mosquitoes, and proportion of mosquitoes infected), we extracted the number of participants experiencing the event of interest and the total number of patients or mosquitoes in each treatment arm of each trial.
There was a slight improvement in stage: the proportion of stage I II was 2.8% in the 1976 1980 period and 8.8% in the 2001 2005 period (P<0.001).
Only for cancer stage, the proportion of excluded OCP with stage II cancer was lower, and the proportion with stage III cancer was higher, compared to included OCP (p < 0.01).
Only for cancer stage, the proportion of excluded cancer patients with stage II cancer was lower, and the proportion with stage III cancer was higher, as opposed to included cancer patients (p < 0.04).
At the peak of population growth during the second stage, the proportion of children tends to be high, while in the third stage it is low.
For cases without a recorded stage, the proportion of EP was broadly similar to those in cases with a later stage at presentation.
At this embryonic stage, the proportion of myofibers with a cross-sectional area above 80 µm2 is much higher in the Col25a1−/− forelimb muscles than in the same muscle masses in the control embryos.
During the initial stage, the proportion of active monitoring increased from 28.4% in 2006 to 68.7% in 2007.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com